state-action pair
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- Africa > Sudan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Oceania > New Zealand > North Island > Auckland Region > Auckland (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Questionnaire & Opinion Survey (0.94)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.94)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games (1.00)
- Education (0.68)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.28)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.28)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Belmont (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Appendix to Weakly Coupled Deep Q-Networks A Proofs
We prove part the first part of the proposition (weak duality) by induction. It is well-known that, by the value iteration algorithm's convergence, Q Consider a state s S and a feasible action a A (s). We use an induction proof. B (w), which follows by the convergence of value iteration.A.2 Proof of Theorem 1 Proof. Now we state the following lemma.
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Arlington County > Arlington (0.04)
- South America > Brazil (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
A Hyperparameter Settings of RD
In this section, we describe details about hyperparameter setting of RD. SAC-N-Unc and TD3-N-Unc, M is set to 1/10 of the total training steps. To ensure fairness, algorithms employing RD are implemented using CORL repository [54]. By modifying the original SAC/TD3 algorithm to employ a critic ensemble of number N and incorporate an uncertainty regularization term within the policy update process, we derive these backbone algorithms. Additionally, using RD with fewer Q ensembles can achieve similar or even better results than the backbone methods using more Q ensembles, indicating its potential in reducing computing resource consumption.